Many teams consider a data room only after asking whether the file platform they already pay for will do. Box and Citrix ShareFile are the two most common answers. Both are American, both launched in 2005, both are certified to SOC 2 and ISO 27001 with HIPAA listed, and both integrate with the tools companies already use: single sign-on, a public API, a mobile app and e-signature. The question is how far that gets you on a transaction.
Security posture
Box 9.0, ShareFile 8.8. Certifications are strong on both sides, and both support SSO, two-factor login, watermarks and an audit trail. ShareFile lists document rights control, which lets an owner restrict printing or downloading after sharing; Box does not list it. Box lists GDPR in addition to HIPAA. Neither redacts inside the platform.
Deal workflow
Box 8.0, ShareFile 7.6. Both handle bulk uploads, mobile access and signatures well. Box adds AI features that help find and summarize content across large libraries. What both lack is a structured Q&A module, the part of a data room that keeps buyer questions, answers and approvals organized. On a single-counterparty transaction with a handful of questions, email may be enough. On an auction, it is not.
Before you reuse your file platform
Check whether guests can be confined to one folder, whether you can see who viewed each file, and whether permissions can be revoked instantly at the end of the process. Both platforms can do this, but configuration matters more than in a purpose-built room.
Everyday usability
ShareFile 8.8, Box 8.5. ShareFile’s guest view is simple for external visitors. Box is familiar to its own users but can feel broad for an outsider who only needs one folder.
Internal users matter here too. If your finance and legal teams already live in Box, they will move faster in a deal folder there than in any new tool, and that familiarity has real value on a short timetable. The same is true of ShareFile in firms that already use it to exchange files with clients. The flip side is that permissions in a general platform are shaped for everyday collaboration, so it is easier to over-share by accident. Review guest access before every round of invitations.
Pricing
Box lists from $15 per user per month; ShareFile lists from $55 a month. With four paid Box users the cost is $60 a month, already above ShareFile’s entry price, and every additional seat widens the gap. Both list a free trial. Pricing clarity is close: Box 7.5, ShareFile 7.4. Check which plan tier includes the watermarking, audit and rights features you need, as entry prices rarely do. The pricing guide explains how per-user and flat pricing scale.
Service and support
ShareFile 7.6, Box 7.5. Both provide standard business support. Neither scores near the dedicated transaction rooms on our service criterion, so confirm support hours before a deadline-driven process.
Configuring either one for a deal
If you do decide to run a transaction from a file platform, the setup needs more care than in a purpose-built room. Create a separate top-level folder for the deal, with subfolders numbered to match the index you will share with the buyer. Give external guests access only to that folder, and use groups rather than individual shares so you can revoke access in one step.
Turn on watermarks for every guest-facing file, and on ShareFile apply document rights control to anything sensitive. Require two-factor login for external users. Decide how questions will be handled, since neither platform has a Q&A module: a shared tracker with clear owners and an approval step before any answer goes out is the minimum. Schedule a weekly export of the audit trail so you have a record if a dispute arises.
At closing, remove external access, archive the folder and keep the audit records with the deal files.
When to move to a dedicated room
Three signs suggest the file platform has been outgrown. More than one or two outside parties need access at once. Questions are arriving faster than a tracker can keep up with. Or the documents include personal data that should be redacted before anyone outside sees it. Any one of those is a good reason to open a dedicated room for the transaction, while keeping Box or ShareFile for everyday work.
Four deal situations, four answers
A founder selling a small software business to a single strategic buyer, with a few hundred files and one lawyer on each side, can run the process from either platform without much strain. The buyer’s questions fit in a shared tracker, and the familiarity of a tool the seller already uses outweighs anything a specialist room adds. Pick whichever one the company pays for today.
A dental or physiotherapy group selling to a consolidator is a different case. Patient-related records may sit in the folder, both vendors list HIPAA, and ShareFile’s document rights control lets the seller stop a reviewer printing a schedule of patient contracts. That tips the job toward ShareFile, provided the plan you hold includes those controls.
A venture-backed company opening its books to a lead investor often already lives in Box. If the round has one lead and a short list of follow-on funds, Box with careful folder permissions is workable, and its AI features help the finance lead pull answers from board packs quickly.
A divisional carve-out with employee files, several bidders and a structured question process is where both platforms fall short together. No Q&A module and no redaction means extra tools, extra spreadsheets and more room for a privacy mistake.
Security questions worth asking either vendor
Certificates describe the vendor’s controls, not yours. Ask for the SOC 2 report under NDA and read the exceptions section, and check the scope and expiry date on the ISO 27001 certificate. If HIPAA matters, ask whether a business associate agreement is available on the plan you intend to use rather than assuming it.
Then look at the gaps that matter for a transaction. Box does not list document rights control, so a guest who can download a file keeps it; decide folder by folder whether download should be allowed at all. ShareFile lists rights control, but confirm which tier enables it. On both, check whether external guests can be forced through two-factor login and how long audit records are retained after a guest is removed.
Contract terms that change the real cost
The headline figures, $15 per user per month for Box and $55 a month for ShareFile, are starting points. Ask whether external guests count as paid users, whether the controls you need sit in the entry tier or a higher one, and whether the plan is billed monthly or only on an annual commitment. A deal that lasts four months on an annual contract costs a full year.
Moving a live process into a dedicated room
If the process grows mid-stream, plan the move rather than improvising it. Export the folder tree with its numbering intact, export the audit history so the record of who saw what before the switch is preserved, and re-invite guests into the new room in groups that mirror the old folders. Tell bidders the date of the move in advance so nobody works from a stale link.
Which one for which job
| Job | Better fit |
|---|---|
| Company already standardized on Box | Box |
| Restricting downloads on files sent to clients | ShareFile |
| AI search across a large document library | Box |
| Client portal for an accounting or advisory firm | ShareFile |
| Sale with multiple bidders and Q&A | Neither; use a dedicated room |
If your process has outgrown file sharing, our due diligence shortlist lists rooms built for it.